Combining Normal random variables: totals, multiples and the key result
This section starts the A Level unit Statistics 3 (WST03/01), which counts towards Further Mathematics.
On every recent S3 paper, the longest question, worth 15 or 16 of the 75 marks, has been about combining Normal random variables: a total, a difference, then a mixture of the two.
This section builds the one result behind all of it and uses it for totals and multiples; the next section deals with differences and with the traps in the closing part of that question.
You need the S1 Normal work (standardising and the tables) and the rules and .
- M1 is a method mark: a correct method applied to this question's numbers. dM1 can only be earned if the M mark before it was. A1 is an accuracy mark and needs its M mark; A1* marks an answer printed in the question, so every step must be shown.
- B1 stands alone (a stated fact, a value from the tables). A1ft and B1ft (follow through) let you keep a mark for using your own earlier wrong answer correctly.
- awrt means "anything which rounds to"; cso means correct solution only; isw means correct work followed by an unneeded slip is marked on the correct part. A misread that keeps the question's character costs two A or B marks.
- S3 habits: the distribution written as before any probability, the standardisation shown, table values to 4 d.p. (, , , ), and final answers to 3 s.f. unless the stem says otherwise.
The idea: what happens when you add random amounts?
A shop sells apples whose masses vary: some 150 g, some 170 g, most close to 160 g.
Put five apples in a bag.
The bag's total mass also varies, and the questions a packer asks are about the total: how likely is a bag to be over 830 g?
To answer, you need the distribution of a sum of random variables, not of one.
Two things about a total are fairly obvious.
Its mean should be five times the mean of one apple.
And it should vary more than one apple does, because five apples' worth of variation is piling up.
What is less obvious is how much more.
Heavy and light apples partly cancel in a bag, so the spread does not grow five times.
The rule that captures this exactly is that variances add, while standard deviations do not.
The other surprise is shape.
If each apple's mass is Normal, then the total is Normal too.
That is a special property of the Normal distribution, and it is what lets every S3 question finish with the Normal tables.
The result
Learn it in this form.
If and independently, then
Three things to read in it:
1. Means behave like ordinary numbers. Multiply, add and subtract them exactly as the expression says.
2. Variances are always added, even for , and each is multiplied by the square of its coefficient. A variance can never be negative, and subtracting a random amount adds uncertainty; it never removes it.
3. Independence is required for the variance rule. The mean rule holds whatever the dependence.
Learn it. This result is a formula you are expected to know: it is not printed in the Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables booklet in this form.
The booklet's Statistics S3 section prints only the variance part, for independent and .
No proofs are required.
The result extends to any number of independent Normal variables: is Normal, with mean the sum of the means and variance the sum of the variances.
Why it works (not examined)
The mean rule comes straight from the definition of expectation: , because an expectation is a weighted sum and sums can be split.
For the variance, write and , the deviations from the means.
Then
The first and last terms are and .
The middle term measures whether and tend to be above their means together.
For independent variables , so it vanishes.
With in place of the middle term changes sign, but it is still zero, and : that is why the variances add for a difference too.
A small exploration with dice shows the rule at work.
One fair die has variance .
The total of two separate dice can be listed in full (36 equally likely outcomes) and has variance , exactly twice as much.
Doubling the score on one die gives 2, 4, ..., 12 with variance , four times as much.
Same mean, 7, in both cases, very different spread.
That the shape stays Normal for Normal variables is a deeper fact, proved at university with moment generating functions.
Two copies or one copy twice? against
This is the idea that decides more marks in this unit than any other.
Suppose square tiles have side cm.
- Four separate tiles laid in a row. The row's length is , a sum of four independent sides. Mean ; variance .
- The perimeter of one tile. That is : one random side, used four times. Mean ; variance .
The means agree.
The variances do not: for separate copies against for one copy multiplied by .
The sketch below shows the two distributions.
The reason is the cancelling described at the start.
In a row of four tiles a large tile is often next to a small one, so errors partly cancel.
In one tile's perimeter there is nothing to cancel: if the side is too big, all four sides are too big.
So before writing any variance, ask: is each item a fresh, independent copy, or is the same item counted several times? The words of the question decide.
"The total of 5 apples" means five copies.
"Three times the mass of an apple" means for one apple.
Using the distribution: the method
1. Define the new variable in words and symbols, for example .
2. Mean: combine the means exactly as the expression says.
3. Variance: add the variances, each times its coefficient squared; count separate copies one by one.
4. Write . This line usually earns M1 A1.
5. Standardise with the standard deviation, the square root of the variance: .
6. Use the tables: to 4 d.p., at rounded to 2 d.p. A calculator's Normal function gives a slightly different value; both are accepted when the method is shown, which is why a mark scheme gives a range.
What the answers mean
A probability about a total is a statement about bags, rows, loads.
"" says about 13% of bags of five apples will weigh more than 830 g, so a packer who labels bags "800 g" gives away more than 30 g of extra fruit in roughly one bag in eight (and some extra fruit in about half of all bags, since the mean is exactly 800 g).
Notice how the spread of a total grows only like while its mean grows like : relative to its size, a large total is far more predictable than one item.
This is the idea behind the next S3 topic, the distribution of the sample mean , where comes from exactly this rule.
Where this leads
The same algebra appears across science and finance.
In manufacturing, tolerances stack: the gap left when parts are assembled is a linear combination of the parts' sizes.
In finance, the risk of a portfolio is a combination of the variances of its holdings (with a covariance term when they are not independent, the term that vanished above).
In S3 itself, the sample mean, the two-sample test and the standard error all rest on "variances add".
- Independent random variables: the value one takes gives no information about the value the other takes; needed for the variances to add.
- Linear combination of random variables: an expression (or a longer one) with constants and .
- Distribution of a linear combination: if and independently, then (learn it: not in the booklet in this form; the booklet prints for independent and under Statistics S3).
- Sum of independent copies: , not to be confused with .
The mass of an apple, grams, is modelled as .
Five apples, chosen at random, are put in a bag of negligible mass.
Find the probability that the total mass of the apples in the bag is more than 830 g.
(4)
1. ; M1
2. , so A1
3. M1
4. (calculator 0.1318) A1
Answer: (3 s.f.; awrt 0.131 or 0.132).
About one bag in eight is over 830 g.
Check the size: is g above the mean and the standard deviation is about g, a little over one standard deviation, so a tail of about 13% is sensible.
The side length of a square tile, cm, is modelled as .
(a) Find the probability that the perimeter of a randomly chosen tile is more than 81.5 cm. (4)
(b) Four tiles are chosen at random and laid side by side in a row. Find the probability that the length of the row is more than 81.5 cm. (4)
1. (a) Perimeter : one side used four times. M1
2. , so A1
3. M1
4. A1
5. (b) : four separate tiles. M1
6. , so A1
7. M1
8. A1
Answer: (a) (3 s.f.)
(b) (calculator ).
The same mean and the same cut-off give probabilities that differ by a factor of about 17, purely because one tile's error cannot cancel against another's.
Apples have mass grams and pears have mass grams.
A gift box has mass grams.
A gift box is filled with 6 apples and 4 pears, all chosen at random, and all masses are independent.
Using standardisation, find the probability that the total mass of a filled gift box is less than 1.8 kg.
(5)
1. (all in grams) B1
2. M1
3. , so A1
4. M1
5. (calculator 0.0525) A1
Answer: (3 s.f.; awrt 0.0525 or 0.0526).
About one box in twenty is under 1.8 kg.
The units were matched first: 1.8 kg became 1800 g before standardising.
The mass of a box of books, kg, is modelled as .
A lift has a safe load of 474 kg.
Nine boxes, chosen at random, are put in the lift.
Using standardisation, show that the probability that the total mass of the nine boxes is more than the safe load is 0.0228 (4)
1. ; M1
2. , so A1
3. M1
4. A1*
Answer: , as required.
The line and the table value are the evidence; writing only "0.0228 from my calculator" earns at most the first two marks.
Had you used as the standard deviation (treating the nine boxes as one box times nine), the probability would be about : wildly different.
When a part says "using standardisation", the line with your numbers in it must be on the page.
Examiners report full answers from a calculator's Normal function with no in sight; under that instruction they do not earn the accuracy mark, however correct the number.
- for a sum of three. For the variance is ; belongs to , one item tripled. Ask "separate copies or one copy?" before you write the variance.
- Variance used as the standard deviation. has standard deviation , not 720. Divide by the square root when you standardise; dividing by the variance gives a tiny and a probability near 0.5.
- Standard deviations added. . Add the variances, then take one square root at the end.
- The wrong tail at the end. For "more than", . A correct is often left as the answer, or is taken when was already the right tail. Sketch the curve and shade the region before the last line.
Check your understanding
1. The random variables and are independent. Write down the distribution of , giving its mean and variance. (2)
Total: [2]
2. A student says: " and have the same distribution, because both have mean ." Explain why the student is wrong, stating the variance of each. (2)
Total: [2]
3. The mass of an egg, grams, is modelled as . Six eggs, chosen at random, are packed in a box whose mass is grams, independent of the eggs.
(a) Find the distribution of the total mass of a full box. (2)
(b) Using standardisation, find the probability that a full box has a total mass between 390 g and 420 g. (4)
Total: [6]
4. The volume of coffee poured by a machine into a cup, ml, is modelled as . The machine fills 25 cups, chosen at random, from one container.
Using standardisation, show that the probability that the 25 cups take more than 6045 ml in total is 0.0668 (4)
Total: [4]
5. Slices of bread have mass grams and portions of filling have mass grams. A sandwich is made from two slices of bread and one portion of filling, all chosen at random and independent.
(a) Find the probability that a sandwich has mass less than 120 g. (4)
A pack holds three sandwiches.
(b) Find the probability that the total mass of the sandwiches in a pack is more than 405 g. (4)
(c) Explain why the variance in part (a) uses for the bread and not . (1)
Total: [9]
6. The random variable . The random variable is the sum of four independent observations of . Given that , find the value of . (3)
Total: [3]
7. Explain what is wrong with the claim "if and are independent then ". (2)
Total: [2]
Answers
1. Mean B1; variance , so B1
2. is two independent copies, variance ; is one copy doubled, variance B1. Same mean but different variances, so different distributions: is more spread out because nothing can cancel B1
3. (a) : mean M1; variance , A1 (b) M1 M1 (standardising both ends); M1; , so (3 s.f.) A1
4. , M1; , A1; M1; A1*
5. (a) : mean M1; variance A1; M1; (calculator 0.0409) A1 (b) M1 A1; M1; (calculator 0.0658; awrt 0.0655 to 0.0658) A1 (c) The two slices are different, independent slices, so each contributes its own variance of ; would be one slice doubled, B1
6. M1; gives , so M1; A1
7. Variances always add for independent variables, , because B1. The claim could even give a negative variance (if ), which is impossible; subtracting a random amount adds uncertainty B1